Whereas, if an evolutionist provides the data that supports your world view, (which for most of them, has no objective basis for this, to lie, or something else, as right or wrong ) most creationists I know would, a priori, assume that you are not lying or fudging, but would try with the data at face value. Re your last comment, to say, it has no relevance for the actual age is very difficult to understand, to put it very gently; neither you, nor I have to see a specialist in the field that it is either the result of pollution or it is very important to have the age of the sample. However, I am even more excited at the anticipated C14 Dating of a piece of soft tissue from a Triceratops, the piece is in the possession of our friends in the creation Research Society, and, to my knowledge, it will be carefully analyzed. (3) Among the many discoveries by the Horner team, the research of Mary Schweitzer and her helper was observed that the soft tissue in a T-Rex thigh bone after EDTA-treatment. Then if you see some small holes in the armor, to ask him to consider seriously, how open he is, the evidence, and how well he really understands the case has been answered for the flood Geology and how many of the supposedly insurmountable objections with further research. one-off events. Now a days you need a degree. (2) Horner is the Director of the paleontological section of the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman, MT and was a consultant for the movie Jurassic Park, but both are classified as paleontologists because of their excellent research and field studies. And nowhere is this more acutely evident than in the study of the unobservable, unrepeatable past, i.e. The lead presenter, Dr. Thomas Seiler, a German physicist, whose PhD from the Technical University of Munich.. But I can’t help but notice how a discussion about whether the dino bones are old or not, based on the evidence, all of a sudden a sermon on world resonates beliefs-is what it is all about anyway. In fact, the whole reason why everyone is so keen to insist that this (and all the other C14-age, the ‘as should be’, the samples supposedly millions of years old), are the result of contamination is, precisely because everyone recognizes how very relevant it is to the age of the sample, which is why it is so disturbing, and otherwise inexplicable, to a long-ager. Publicatiosn of a paper in the proceedings of the follow-up paper, but in General, these \\\”extended abstracts\\\”, again with very little in the way of peer-review. But then, that would be rational and scientific, and there is much more to the game, it seems
The numbers go from 4 to 6, omitting 5, was, the 14 C in dino bones.) So much for science’s alleged openness to the data. This is the scientific way to confirm, error, in contrast to the blatant censorship of data simply because they speak seemingly to withdraw from the established paradigm. This was the case for many years, and still they fall back on ‘contamination’. D in Geology as he is, and the white, I avoid entering into a discussion with him on a level that I would not be able to. One of these messages says, that after “the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the results. His team encouraged me and our Paleo group to continue our C-14 Dating of dinosaur bones and other fossils. And has anyone by CMI. Thomas Seiler, but it would be best if he would publish his findings in detail in a journal. But the point was less to do with peer review during the process of paper-acceptance, as with the peer-review, due to the peer interaction and criticism, where necessary, after such a representation, which is now cut off. Jerry Bergmann’s book slaughter of the Innocents, both available in our Shop. (See previous comments and responses re-contamination, corrections, diamonds, and more). So, what these gentlemen say that the conventional wisdom about the dinosaurs of ancient times could be about 14C, you don’t touch it. For many documented examples you will find on the DVD Expelled: the movie, and Dr. contact the conference organizers for their statement that the alleged deletion of I would like to your readers that Dr. (4) I understand that Horner and Taylor have met paleontology conferences and whereas Horner gets the publicity, Joe’s research is, of course, less important. Kudos to Dr. I’m not a Ph. Wieland has zero expertise in any area of earth science, let alone geochronlogy, the comments he can make in relation to the competence of the research are the opinions of a biased and uneducated lay people. I have no doubt, however, in the truth of the Bible, and I want to help my brother in a way that I can.. Diamond is so hard because the atoms are in the crystal lattice so densely Packed together, it can squeeze no bacteria, for example. It is as if the tables have turned and the atheists or non-creationists use faith-based arguments, while the creationists with facts, science-based arguments
- If all of the dinosaur bones contain radio-carbon, then this indicates that all of the dinosaur bones young, and the dinosaurs did not live millions of years ago..
- So, I would think it would be possible that the dinosaurs were died-like microorganisms that lived in the interior of your cells to live, according to the actual dinosaurs, and then it showed up in the C14-Dating.
- And it is, of course, why the moderators went in this case to so much trouble to cover bases, so that even professionals in the field of geochronology would be able to see the very strong case that the pollution was highly unlikely (for one thing, the delta 13C corrections, the commitment by competent laboratories, as a matter of routine.
- So we have asked repeatedly, you have to C-14 date the fossils in letters to Jack Horner and a team of paleontologists from the University and six conference abstracts.
- Why do you think that the creationists encourage you to make your own radio-carbon research on dinosaur bones.
- But the whole point here is that, if the fossils were so old, it’s actually a C14 signal.
- Not willing to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors, or even to the AOGS officers, until after an investigation.
The detailed explanation is in the radiocarbon Chapter of The creation answers book, see home page free downloads, Chapter for Chapter, and smarter still to keep your own copy of the whole book from our online store.